Saudi Arabia faces international ire over the death sentence of Anojan Sivarasa, a 24‑year‑old Sri Lankan migrant.
Aapologizing for an online remark, Sivarasa, a Tamil‑speaking worker, is now on death row after a court moved to apply Sharia law for a post he deleted.
The case began when Sivarasa’s comment on Facebook about the Prophet Muhammad was deemed blasphemous by Saudi authorities. Following the deletion of the post, Saudi prosecutors filed an appeal to elevate the case from cybercrime to Sharia law, thereby upgrading the penalty to execution.
International reaction has been swift. Human‑rights organisations, religious leaders from both Hindu and Buddhist communities, and Sri Lankan political parties have united in appeals to spare Sivarasa. Sri Lanka’s President Anura Kumara Dissanayake met the family in September and pledged to press for a clemency or a review of the sentence.
Despite diplomatic pressure, Saudi authorities have not released a public execution date. Reports indicate that death‑row inmates in Saudi prisons are denied personal devices, making family communication virtually impossible.
Rights groups warn that harsh sentences for online speech reflect a broader pattern, citing the 2023 case of retired teacher Mohammed Al Ghamdi, who was initially sentenced to death for social media posts but later convicted to 30 years in prison.
With over 10 million foreign workers in Saudi Arabia, the legal vulnerability of migrant laborers—particularly language barriers and lack of legal representation—poses significant human‑rights challenges. The Sivarasa case has brought these concerns to the international spotlight, urging reforms to safeguard workers and ensure fair legal processes.
