CHICAGO (Echosphere News) — A federal judge has ruled that federal law enforcement in Chicago must limit the use of force against peaceful protesters and news media representatives, proclaiming current practices violate constitutional rights.
This groundbreaking preliminary injunction follows a lawsuit claiming that federal agents employed excessive force during immigration enforcement actions in the Chicago area.
U.S. District Judge Sara Ellis issued her ruling after expressing frustration over federal officials' noncompliance with her previous orders, which had already mandated the wearing of identification badges and prohibited specific riot-control techniques, such as tear gas, against peaceful demonstrators and journalists.
Judge Ellis articulated her commitment to preserving the rights of citizens in public spaces, describing the vibrant nature of Chicago and emphasizing the importance of safe protest actions.
“It is simply untrue that the Chicago area is rife with rioters,” Judge Ellis stated, refuting narratives that depict the city as violent. She previously heard accounts of various incidents from the immigration crackdown initiated in September, including allegations of tear gas being used on peaceful crowds.
The judge stressed that agents must provide two warnings before deploying riot control measures and can only use force when absolutely necessary, underlining the need for a compassionate approach towards protesters.
During a lengthy court session, witnesses recounted harrowing experiences, including confrontations involving tear gas and the presence of firearms. Many expressed ongoing anxieties about participating in future protests. “I feel immense fear and question my safety every time I consider attending a protest,” shared Leslie Cortez, a community organizer.
The documentation of these events serves to hold federal agents accountable and protect the rights of citizens to freely assemble and express dissent without undue aggression.
A follow-up hearing will address potential appeals from the government as discussions continue regarding the treatment of citizens during immigration enforcement interventions.
