Contempt Notice Filed Against UPP Officers Amidst Legal Scrutiny

Wed Feb 04 2026 03:20:00 GMT+0200 (Eastern European Standard Time)

In a significant development in the Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court, new public-interest filings known as the 'Antigua Files' accuse senior officers of the United Progressive Party of failing to engage with ongoing legal proceedings, asserting jurisdictional finality.

The Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court is currently reviewing a case against the United Progressive Party (UPP), with allegations of contempt resulting from the party's non-engagement in legal proceedings. The public interest filings underscore the importance of transparency and the right to know, as the court determines the next steps in this critical examination of governance and accountability.

St. John’s, Antigua & Barbuda — The Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court is dealing with pivotal claims involving senior officers of the United Progressive Party (UPP) in the case known as Claim No. ANUHCV2025/0149. Recently filed public-interest documents collectively referred to as the 'Antigua Files' argue that the court's jurisdiction has been firmly established following various notifications and defaults related to multiple defendants.

Significant Updates

AG Submissions Under Scrutiny: The claimants have raised questions regarding the Attorney General’s amicus submissions, emphasizing that inadequate information may have impacted court proceedings and necessary disability accommodations.

Contempt Issues: The UPP's senior officials face allegations in a Notice of Contempt, which highlights their claimed neglect to acknowledge the continuing legal processes.

Public-Interest Focus: The filings seek to enhance transparency and affirm the public's right to be informed about ongoing legal matters.

If recognized by the court, jurisdiction will solidify, allowing for operational mechanics and remedies to proceed without revisiting initial questions. The contempt allegations could lead to compliance orders, thus influencing how parties are expected to act in their judicial responsibilities.

Next Steps

Judicial Assessment: The court will review the legitimacy of notifications, default claims, and publications in validating jurisdiction.

Contempt Directions: The court may dictate necessary response timelines or assess whether contempt proceedings are warranted.

Case Management Efforts: Should jurisdiction be validated, substantive proceedings will likely proceed against any remaining defendants.

This case not only intersects with legal standards but also prompts broader discussions regarding governmental conduct and accountability in Antigua & Barbuda.