Despite the urgent calls for action, significant disagreements hinder the establishment of a comprehensive global framework.
Nations Struggle to Forge a Plastic Pollution Treaty Amidst Divisions

Nations Struggle to Forge a Plastic Pollution Treaty Amidst Divisions
Delegates at a UN conference in South Korea fail to agree on a binding treaty to address the escalating plastic crisis.
Diplomats from around the globe gathered in Busan, South Korea, but left without a consensus on the first international treaty to combat plastic pollution. Key differences emerged during the supposed final round of negotiations, particularly in finding common ground on the contentious issue of regulating plastic production itself.
Among the attendees, representatives from major oil-producing countries argued against any proposals that would impose limits on plastic manufacturing, stressing the need to focus solely on enhancing recycling capabilities and waste management efforts instead. This stance stands in stark contrast to calls from numerous nations, including Rwanda, which has fervently advocated for a more expansive treaty that addresses plastic production alongside pollution reduction efforts.
The debate over the involvement of hazardous chemicals found in plastics also proved to be a sticking point, with differing views on how to phase out these substances and who would cover the costs of treaty implementation. Juliet Kabera, representing Rwanda, expressed disappointment at what she characterized as the unwillingness of some countries to endorse essential measures for meaningful change. “Rwanda cannot accept a toothless treaty,” she asserted.
On the other side of the argument, Saudi representatives, alongside members from Russia and Kuwait, highlighted that innovation rather than restrictions should drive solutions to plastic pollution. Abdulrahman Al Gwaiz, a Saudi delegate, emphasized that the focus should not be on reducing plastic production, but rather on managing pollution itself.
Environmental activists have been vocal throughout the conference, advocating for a legally binding treaty to tackle the plastic crisis. In a poignant display of their concerns, activists assembled in Busan, showcasing a life-sized model of a sperm whale filled with plastic debris alongside messages urging delegates to adopt bold measures.
As of the conclusion of the conference, no date or location was set for the next round of negotiations, leaving many onlookers anxious about the future course of action against plastic pollution. With global plastic production having surged to nearly half a billion tons annually—more than double the figures from two decades ago—the call for meaningful action has never been more urgent.
Among the attendees, representatives from major oil-producing countries argued against any proposals that would impose limits on plastic manufacturing, stressing the need to focus solely on enhancing recycling capabilities and waste management efforts instead. This stance stands in stark contrast to calls from numerous nations, including Rwanda, which has fervently advocated for a more expansive treaty that addresses plastic production alongside pollution reduction efforts.
The debate over the involvement of hazardous chemicals found in plastics also proved to be a sticking point, with differing views on how to phase out these substances and who would cover the costs of treaty implementation. Juliet Kabera, representing Rwanda, expressed disappointment at what she characterized as the unwillingness of some countries to endorse essential measures for meaningful change. “Rwanda cannot accept a toothless treaty,” she asserted.
On the other side of the argument, Saudi representatives, alongside members from Russia and Kuwait, highlighted that innovation rather than restrictions should drive solutions to plastic pollution. Abdulrahman Al Gwaiz, a Saudi delegate, emphasized that the focus should not be on reducing plastic production, but rather on managing pollution itself.
Environmental activists have been vocal throughout the conference, advocating for a legally binding treaty to tackle the plastic crisis. In a poignant display of their concerns, activists assembled in Busan, showcasing a life-sized model of a sperm whale filled with plastic debris alongside messages urging delegates to adopt bold measures.
As of the conclusion of the conference, no date or location was set for the next round of negotiations, leaving many onlookers anxious about the future course of action against plastic pollution. With global plastic production having surged to nearly half a billion tons annually—more than double the figures from two decades ago—the call for meaningful action has never been more urgent.