**Verdict Approaches in Landmark Mass Rape Trial in France**

As judges prepare to deliver their verdicts, the Pelicot case serves as a powerful catalyst for change in France's legal approach to rape.

Judges in Avignon are set to deliver verdicts on Thursday for 51 men involved in a mass rape trial that has captivated and horrified France. The case centers on Gisèle Pelicot, a 72-year-old woman who has become an unexpected symbol of feminism and resilience after years of abuse by her former husband, Dominique Pelicot. For nearly a decade, Dominique drugged Gisèle, allowing dozens of men he recruited to assault her while she was incapacitated.

In a groundbreaking move, Gisèle waived her anonymity to shine a light on her ordeal, flipping the script of victimization. "Shame has swapped sides," she stated during the trial, underscoring the vital need for societal change regarding sexual violence. Although Dominique has admitted his culpability, many of the other defendants deny they committed rape, citing various defenses.

Prosecutors have requested sentences between four and 20 years, depending on individual roles in the heinous acts. Dominique Pelicot is facing a potential 20-year sentence for his primary role in orchestrating the rapes, stating in court, "I am a rapist," while pleading for forgiveness from his ex-wife and three children. The other accused, mostly from the local area and ranging in age from 27 to 74, are facing similar charges and have been dubbed “Monsieur-Tout-Le-Monde” or Mr. Everybody, as they come from varied walks of life, including security, firefighting, and transport.

The case has ignited public outcry, emphasizing the necessity of reforming France's rape laws to include explicit consent, a step that advocates argue is essential for modern justice. Evidence of the assaults was recorded by Dominique and presented during the trial, leading to widespread condemnation among activists who have rallied in support of Gisèle.

In her steadfast presence at court, Gisèle has rejected the notion of becoming an icon, stating, "I want all women who have been raped to know they can also come forward." Yet, her lawyer acknowledges the psychological toll her experience has taken, reinforcing that her advocacy is grounded in personal pain and transformation.

As the trial draws to a close, its implications resonate beyond the courtroom. Protesters continue to voice the sentiment that "Shame is changing sides," with many recognizing the case as a pivotal moment in re-evaluating how sexual violence is treated in France. Activists urge that discussions around consent and societal attitudes to such crimes must evolve for meaningful change to occur. This trial not only serves as an indictment of individual actions but also as a broader critique of systemic failings in addressing sexual violence in society.