Hongkongers have voted in an election seen as a test of public sentiment following a deadly fire that angered some in the city.
The government mounted a huge campaign to encourage residents to choose members of the Legislative Council (LegCo). All of the candidates have been vetted to ensure they are loyal to China.
Voter turnout was 31.9%, according to the city's electoral office. The last election in 2021 saw the administrative region's lowest-ever turnout of 30% amid widespread voter apathy.
This election took place as many were mourning a devastating fire in Hong Kong's Tai Po district last month that killed nearly 160 people.
Around 1.3 million voted out of around 4.1 million registered voters in the city, which has a population of more than seven million.
China earlier made sweeping changes to Hong Kong's electoral system to ensure only patriots could run for seats.
Beijing has said the changes were necessary to ensure stability in Hong Kong, but critics say they weakened democracy.
Ahead of the recent election, authorities distributed aid to survivors of the Tai Po fire, arrested suspects, and sought to improve building safety, as some raised questions about the incident.
A total of 161 candidates competed for 90 seats in the LegCo, which acts as a mini parliament and can make and amend laws. The election was marked by extensive campaigning and government incentives to boost voter turnout.
However, in recent days, focus has been on the fire that engulfed high-rise residential blocks at Wang Fuk Court in Tai Po, marking the worst blaze in Hong Kong in over 70 years. The death toll is expected to rise as recovery efforts continue.
Authorities have ordered the creation of an independent committee to investigate the cause of the fire, and arrests have been made on suspicion of manslaughter. Investigators found that the scaffolding mesh used for renovations failed to meet safety standards, allowing the fire to spread rapidly.
Critics of the government argue that the recent developments in governance exposed by the fire could lead to decreased voter participation in future elections. While pro-establishment voters may be impressed by the swift response to aid the fire victims, disenchantment remains regarding ongoing governance issues.
















