Prosecutors in Australia have filed an appeal against Erin Patterson's life sentence for murdering three relatives by serving them a toxic mushroom meal, citing that the sentence is 'manifestly inadequate'. Last month, Patterson was sentenced to life imprisonment with a minimum of 33 years before eligibility for parole, meaning she won’t be eligible until her 80s.
The Department of Public Prosecutions confirmed the appeal on the basis that the sentence was not sufficient given the severity of her actions. Patterson's case has drawn immense public interest and debate, particularly given the gruesome nature of the crime and the fact that she was serving a meal that included death cap mushrooms.
Last week, Patterson's barrister indicated plans to appeal her conviction, but details have yet to be filed. Her legal team faces the challenge of demonstrating legal errors for the appeal court to consider their case.
During the meal, Patterson killed her in-laws Don and Gail Patterson, both aged 70, and Gail’s sister Heather Wilkinson, 66. The only survivor, Ian Wilkinson, remains in recovery after enduring serious health complications related to the poisoning.
In considering Patterson's sentencing, Justice Christopher Beale acknowledged the horrific nature of her crimes but opted for a lengthy minimum sentence, taking into account her solitary confinement experiences and the danger she may face from other inmates due to her notoriety.
This case has prompted discussions about the intersection of justice, mental health, and public safety, with Patterson’s current living conditions adding controversy to the already sensational case.
