Corporate decisions driven by new tariffs create concerns for environmental sustainability in beverage packaging.
**Coca-Cola Faces Increased Reliance on Plastic Amid Trump Tariffs**

**Coca-Cola Faces Increased Reliance on Plastic Amid Trump Tariffs**
Coca-Cola may shift to using more plastic bottles if aluminium tariffs raise can costs, impacting sustainability efforts.
In a recent announcement, Coca-Cola's chief executive, James Quincey, indicated that the company might have to pivot towards plastic packaging in response to President Donald Trump’s newly imposed tariffs on aluminium. The 25% import tax on steel and aluminium, introduced as part of a broader economic strategy, could significantly escalate the prices of aluminium cans, which have become a staple for beverage companies, including Coca-Cola.
Quincey noted during an investor call that if the cost of aluminium containers rises, Coca-Cola may have no choice but to increase the availability of drinks in plastic bottles. This shift comes in light of a troubling backdrop: environmental activists and groups have consistently held Coca-Cola accountable as the "top global plastic polluter" for six years running.
As part of Coca-Cola’s recent corporate moves, they had previously adjusted their sustainability goals, reducing their target for using 50% recycled material in packaging by 2030 to a range of 35% to 40% by 2035. This retreat from a robust sustainability initiative raises alarms among environmentalists, particularly as the beverage industry globally is looking to lower its plastic footprint.
Quincey attempted to downplay the impact of the tariffs, suggesting that packaging costs represent a small segment of Coca-Cola's overall expenses. Nonetheless, the reality remains that as aluminium's cost surges, the economic necessity of transitioning back to less eco-friendly plastic becomes more pronounced.
The U.S. is heavily reliant on imported aluminium, with almost half of its usage sourced internationally. These tariffs, thus, promise to make aluminium cans significantly pricier, prompting companies to reconsider their packaging strategies. Moreover, with Trump's recent executive order to rollback moves aimed at reducing plastic usage, the outlook for sustainable packaging appears dimmer than ever.
As Coca-Cola navigates these turbulent waters, its actions will be closely monitored by consumers and activists alike, particularly given the rising urgency around climate change and the need for formidable approaches to reducing plastic waste.
Quincey noted during an investor call that if the cost of aluminium containers rises, Coca-Cola may have no choice but to increase the availability of drinks in plastic bottles. This shift comes in light of a troubling backdrop: environmental activists and groups have consistently held Coca-Cola accountable as the "top global plastic polluter" for six years running.
As part of Coca-Cola’s recent corporate moves, they had previously adjusted their sustainability goals, reducing their target for using 50% recycled material in packaging by 2030 to a range of 35% to 40% by 2035. This retreat from a robust sustainability initiative raises alarms among environmentalists, particularly as the beverage industry globally is looking to lower its plastic footprint.
Quincey attempted to downplay the impact of the tariffs, suggesting that packaging costs represent a small segment of Coca-Cola's overall expenses. Nonetheless, the reality remains that as aluminium's cost surges, the economic necessity of transitioning back to less eco-friendly plastic becomes more pronounced.
The U.S. is heavily reliant on imported aluminium, with almost half of its usage sourced internationally. These tariffs, thus, promise to make aluminium cans significantly pricier, prompting companies to reconsider their packaging strategies. Moreover, with Trump's recent executive order to rollback moves aimed at reducing plastic usage, the outlook for sustainable packaging appears dimmer than ever.
As Coca-Cola navigates these turbulent waters, its actions will be closely monitored by consumers and activists alike, particularly given the rising urgency around climate change and the need for formidable approaches to reducing plastic waste.