The lawsuit highlights concerns over children's safety and demands $5 million in damages following the incident.
**Mattel Faces Lawsuit Over Disturbing Misprint on 'Wicked' Dolls Packaging**
**Mattel Faces Lawsuit Over Disturbing Misprint on 'Wicked' Dolls Packaging**
A South Carolina mother is suing Mattel after her daughter accessed a porn site due to a misprinted doll.
In a startling development, Mattel, the renowned toy manufacturer, finds itself embroiled in a controversy that has escalated into a class-action lawsuit. A mother from South Carolina, Holly Ricketson, has initiated legal action against the company after a misprint on the packaging of their newly released 'Wicked' singing dolls inadvertently directed her daughter to a pornographic website. The dolls were launched as a promotional tie-in to the much-anticipated film "Wicked," featuring stars Cynthia Erivo and Ariana Grande.
Ricketson claims that her minor daughter, after receiving the doll, clicked on the link featured on the packaging that led them to explicit adult content. The lawsuit describes their reaction as one of horror, contending that the incident caused emotional distress for both mother and child.
Describing the misprint as an "inexcusable error," court documents argue that the dolls are "unfit for their intended purpose," demanding accountability from Mattel. They also contend that the company has failed to issue refunds for the defective items despite the public outcry. Ricketson emphasized that she never would have made the purchase if she had known about the misplaced internet address.
Not only does the lawsuit call for $5 million in damages for all consumers who purchased the affected dolls, but it also accuses Mattel of negligence, asserting that the company has breached consumer protection laws in California.
Mattel has publicly acknowledged the error and expressed deep regret, advising customers to discard the erroneous packaging. As the 'Wicked' film adaptation continues to perform well at the box office, grossing over $623 million globally since its release, this situation presents a significant distraction for the toy giant.
While the controversy unfolds, a representative from Mattel has been sought for further comment. The incident raises crucial questions about child safety in the toy industry and the vigilance required in product marketing.
Ricketson claims that her minor daughter, after receiving the doll, clicked on the link featured on the packaging that led them to explicit adult content. The lawsuit describes their reaction as one of horror, contending that the incident caused emotional distress for both mother and child.
Describing the misprint as an "inexcusable error," court documents argue that the dolls are "unfit for their intended purpose," demanding accountability from Mattel. They also contend that the company has failed to issue refunds for the defective items despite the public outcry. Ricketson emphasized that she never would have made the purchase if she had known about the misplaced internet address.
Not only does the lawsuit call for $5 million in damages for all consumers who purchased the affected dolls, but it also accuses Mattel of negligence, asserting that the company has breached consumer protection laws in California.
Mattel has publicly acknowledged the error and expressed deep regret, advising customers to discard the erroneous packaging. As the 'Wicked' film adaptation continues to perform well at the box office, grossing over $623 million globally since its release, this situation presents a significant distraction for the toy giant.
While the controversy unfolds, a representative from Mattel has been sought for further comment. The incident raises crucial questions about child safety in the toy industry and the vigilance required in product marketing.
