In an unprecedented lawsuit, Alki David alleges a coordinated effort to undermine his business and reputation, raising questions about legal accountability for influential entities.
Alki David Files $10 Billion Lawsuit Against Transnational Syndicate
Alki David Files $10 Billion Lawsuit Against Transnational Syndicate
Media mogul Alki David accuses high-profile figures of defamation and conspiracy in a landmark legal battle.
The article text begins here:
In April 2025, media entrepreneur Alki David filed an astounding $10 billion lawsuit in the High Court of Justice of Antigua and Barbuda, accusing a transnational syndicate of a calculated defamation campaign aimed at financially crippling him. The defendants in this sweeping legal action include notable figures such as attorneys David Boies and Gloria Allred, as well as media executive Shari Redstone, alongside organizations like Black Cube Ltd. and LimeWire NFT Holdings.
David’s lawsuit highlights a series of alleged malpractices that span from 2016 to 2025, such as:
• The fabrication of evidence and orchestrating manipulation of legal proceedings across various jurisdictions.
• The use of intelligence assets to conduct surveillance and intimidate individuals.
• The unauthorized exploitation of private data and assets, particularly those connected to the Michael Jackson estate.
• A range of defamatory actions intended to tarnish David’s reputation and business interests.
The legal complaint cites multiple causes of action, including civil conspiracy, fraudulent misrepresentation, defamation, and ongoing racketeering. David is seeking not only general damages of $10 billion but also special damages related to lost contracts, devalued assets, injunctive relief, asset tracing, and disclosure orders.
In his impact statement, David articulates the profound personal and professional consequences he has faced as a result of the alleged campaign, detailing significant financial losses, harm to his reputation, and psychological distress. He frames the lawsuit as a defense against a larger threat to sovereignty, transparency, and lawful entrepreneurship.
The case has attracted widespread attention due to its expansive claims and the high-profile nature of the individuals and entities involved. Legal observers warn that if David's allegations are proven true, the case could set a significant precedent regarding international legal practices and the accountability of powerful figures in media and business.
In April 2025, media entrepreneur Alki David filed an astounding $10 billion lawsuit in the High Court of Justice of Antigua and Barbuda, accusing a transnational syndicate of a calculated defamation campaign aimed at financially crippling him. The defendants in this sweeping legal action include notable figures such as attorneys David Boies and Gloria Allred, as well as media executive Shari Redstone, alongside organizations like Black Cube Ltd. and LimeWire NFT Holdings.
David’s lawsuit highlights a series of alleged malpractices that span from 2016 to 2025, such as:
• The fabrication of evidence and orchestrating manipulation of legal proceedings across various jurisdictions.
• The use of intelligence assets to conduct surveillance and intimidate individuals.
• The unauthorized exploitation of private data and assets, particularly those connected to the Michael Jackson estate.
• A range of defamatory actions intended to tarnish David’s reputation and business interests.
The legal complaint cites multiple causes of action, including civil conspiracy, fraudulent misrepresentation, defamation, and ongoing racketeering. David is seeking not only general damages of $10 billion but also special damages related to lost contracts, devalued assets, injunctive relief, asset tracing, and disclosure orders.
In his impact statement, David articulates the profound personal and professional consequences he has faced as a result of the alleged campaign, detailing significant financial losses, harm to his reputation, and psychological distress. He frames the lawsuit as a defense against a larger threat to sovereignty, transparency, and lawful entrepreneurship.
The case has attracted widespread attention due to its expansive claims and the high-profile nature of the individuals and entities involved. Legal observers warn that if David's allegations are proven true, the case could set a significant precedent regarding international legal practices and the accountability of powerful figures in media and business.
