The United States has solidified new deportation deals with Honduras and Uganda as part of its intensified efforts to combat illegal immigration, sparking condemnation from human rights groups who argue that such measures could endanger vulnerable individuals.
US Expands Deportation Partnerships to Honduras and Uganda Amid Ongoing Immigration Debate

US Expands Deportation Partnerships to Honduras and Uganda Amid Ongoing Immigration Debate
As part of its strategy to manage illegal immigration, the US government has formed agreements with Honduras and Uganda to accept deported migrants, inciting mixed reactions from human rights advocates.
In a bold move to escalate its immigration policy, the United States has entered into bilateral deportation agreements with Honduras and Uganda. These arrangements, revealed in documents sourced by CBS, signal further efforts by the Trump administration to strengthen its approach to managing illegal migration amidst rising concerns about the fate of deported individuals.
Uganda has committed to accept an undetermined number of African and Asian migrants who sought asylum at the US-Mexico border, while Honduras will take in several hundred deported individuals primarily from Spanish-speaking nations. Critics of the policy have voiced serious concerns regarding the safety of these migrants, many of whom could be returned to countries where they might face significant dangers.
Under the terms of the agreement with Uganda, acceptance of deported migrants would be contingent on them having no criminal backgrounds, but the exact figures involved remain vague. In Honduras, the deal covers a two-year timeline, stipulating the reception of families, including children, although there is room for increasing this number.
These agreements are part of a larger initiative aimed at creating international partnerships for the deportation of non-citizens. Recent developments include the signing of a "safe third country" agreement with Paraguay, and Rwanda's commitment to accept up to 250 migrants, subject to their approval on individual cases.
Critics have highlighted that these endeavors could breach international law, raising alarms about potential human rights violations. The US Supreme Court's sanctioning of deportations without permitting individuals to express risks faced upon return has added further fuel to this controversial policy.
As the issue of immigration continues to polarize opinion, the Biden administration is likely to see an escalation of debate surrounding these agreements, with advocates urging for more humane treatment of migrants facing uncertain fates.