The newly signed India-UK trade agreement grants UK firms access to India's vast government procurement market worth £38 billion, encompassing critical sectors. However, despite these promising developments, challenges such as higher pricing, delayed payments, and preferential treatment for local suppliers could hinder UK enterprises' success in competing effectively in this domain.
UK Firms Eye $38 Billion in Indian Government Contracts Amid Complex Challenges

UK Firms Eye $38 Billion in Indian Government Contracts Amid Complex Challenges
The recent India-UK free trade agreement opens lucrative opportunities for UK businesses in India's government procurement market, yet hurdles such as pricing and regulatory issues remain.
The India-UK free trade agreement has opened significant doors for British firms seeking to secure contracts from the Indian government, potentially tapping into a market valued at £38 billion. This landmark deal marks a substantial shift in India's approach to procurement, allowing UK companies to compete in strategic sectors including transport, green energy, and infrastructure, which have traditionally been closed off to foreign competition.
Experts recognize the newfound access as unprecedented and superior to previous agreements, such as the one India established with the UAE. Under the terms of the agreement, UK businesses will now be treated almost as equivalent to Indian suppliers and gain real-time access to information regarding upcoming public tenders.
In a notable development, goods from the UK that incorporate just 20% domestic input can now be offered to the Indian government, which allows for up to 80% of parts or raw materials to be sourced from other nations while still qualifying for procurement preference in India. This flexibility enhances UK firms' prospects of securing a range of government contracts, from rural road projects to educational solar equipment.
However, realizing these opportunities will not be straightforward. Experts caution that while UK firms are recognized as Class-II local suppliers, Indian competitors continue to enjoy preferential treatment as Class-I suppliers. Pricing remains a significant hurdle since UK suppliers often face challenges competing with local firms that offer lower prices, and they may struggle to secure contracts due to these disparities.
Moreover, British companies may encounter issues regarding payment delays and contract enforcement, longstanding issues that complicate public procurement in India. A study revealed that pending payments to suppliers could exceed total annual procurement amounts, posing challenges particularly for foreign entities looking to enter the market.
Despite the recent emphasis on transparency and accessibility in procurement mechanisms, experts argue that the agreement fails to adequately address essential issues like overdue payments and dispute resolution. The absence of the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement's (CETA) dispute settlement provisions for four years may further complicate matters for UK businesses, signaling a need for patience and adaptation to India's intricate regulatory landscape.
India’s initiative to open its government procurement market represents a significant policy transformation, as it has long favored local small and medium enterprises. This shift is seen as part of India's broader strategy to foster international competitiveness among its businesses and potentially set the stage for greater collaboration in negotiations with other trade partners, such as the US.
As India navigates this complex procurement landscape, the hope is that exposing local procurement processes to foreign competition will enhance standards, promote accountability within public entities, and ultimately align with international practices. Despite the challenges ahead, the prospects for UK firms in India’s government procurement market herald a considerable opportunity for innovation and business growth in the evolving climate of international trade.