In a strong defense of the U.S. military approach, Secretary of State Marco Rubio argues that the destruction of a key Iranian nuclear conversion facility represents a major setback for Iran's ambitions, countering findings from a preliminary intelligence report that suggests only minor disruption.
Rubio Defends U.S. Strike's Impact on Iranian Nuclear Aspirations

Rubio Defends U.S. Strike's Impact on Iranian Nuclear Aspirations
Secretary of State Marco Rubio argues that a U.S. attack has significantly hindered Iran's nuclear capabilities, despite dissent from a recent intelligence report.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio has publicly opposed a recent U.S. intelligence report regarding the effectiveness of a military strike against an Iranian nuclear facility, asserting that the operation has dealt a serious blow to Iran's capability to produce nuclear weapons. During a press conference, Rubio emphasized the significance of the conversion facility destroyed during the strike, which he claims is essential for transforming nuclear fuel into a form usable in weaponry.
In his detailed statement, Rubio pointed to the facility in Isfahan, linked to the manufacturing of solid materials from enriched uranium gas, which are required for building nuclear warheads. His comments followed claims made by President Trump, who reiterated that the facilities were “obliterated.” Rubio maintained that the Iranian nuclear program would experience years of hindrance, as opposed to the few months suggested in the Defense Intelligence Agency's preliminary findings.
He noted the critical importance of the conversion facility, arguing, “You can’t do a nuclear weapon without a conversion facility.” Elaborating on the implications of its destruction, Rubio stated that the exact location has been effectively erased from maps and is now “blackened out.” Satellite imagery reportedly confirms substantial damage, but comprehensive assessments await the arrival of international nuclear inspectors on-site.
Analysts and observers express the need for verification through inspections to determine the complete impact of the facility's destruction, raising questions about Iran’s potential for a nuclear resurgence amidst these strikes.