Hadi Matar, who stabbed Salman Rushdie during a public lecture, has been sentenced to 25 years for attempted murder, leaving the author partially blind and injured. Matar's actions have reignited discussions on freedom of speech and the consequences of ideological extremism.
Hadi Matar Receives 25-Year Sentence for Attack on Salman Rushdie

Hadi Matar Receives 25-Year Sentence for Attack on Salman Rushdie
The New Jersey man convicted of attacking the renowned author on stage has been sentenced to 25 years in prison, highlighting the ongoing discourse surrounding freedom of expression.
Hadi Matar, a 27-year-old from New Jersey, has been sentenced to 25 years in prison for the brutal attack on acclaimed novelist Sir Salman Rushdie, which occurred during a lecture in New York in August 2022. Matar was convicted of attempted murder and assault earlier this year, after stabbing Rushdie multiple times in the face and neck, resulting in serious injuries including partial blindness and significant liver damage.
The attack has ties to Rushdie’s controversial novel, *The Satanic Verses*, which has long made him a target for death threats due to its portrayal of the Prophet Muhammad. Matar received the maximum sentence of 25 years for attempting to kill Rushdie and an additional seven years for assaulting Henry Reese, the interviewer present during the incident. The sentences will run concurrently, as both attacks occurred during the same event, according to Chautauqua County District Attorney Jason Schmidt.
During sentencing, Matar, dressed in white-striped prison attire, expressed views on freedom of speech, branding Rushdie a hypocrite and suggesting that he invited hostility. Matar's actions occurred 35 years after the initial controversy surrounding Rushdie’s work, which led to a historic fatwa issued by Iran's supreme leader calling for the author's execution.
Testifying in court, Rushdie described the moment of his attack, recounting how he initially believed he had been punched before realizing the severity of the injuries he sustained from the assault. Prosecutors emphasized the premeditated nature of Matar's actions, pointing out that he specifically targeted Rushdie among the audience.
The defense, however, argued that Matar's intent to kill Rushdie was unproven and did not call any witnesses to testify on his behalf. Matar previously expressed disdain for Rushdie, claiming that he had "attacked Islam," and even praised the fatwa that put the author's life in danger.
Despite the continued threats against him over the years, Rushdie had recently described his life as “relatively normal” before the attack, and his memoir *Knife: Meditations After an Attempted Murder* chronicles his long and challenging recovery journey. The incident serves as a stark reminder of the ongoing tensions surrounding freedom of expression and the real-world repercussions stemming from ideological beliefs.