The One Canadian Economy Act is designed to bolster the economy and reduce reliance on the U.S., but it faces backlash over potential impacts on Indigenous communities and environmental concerns.
Canada's New Law Aims to Accelerate National Projects Amid Trade Pressures

Canada's New Law Aims to Accelerate National Projects Amid Trade Pressures
Canada's parliament introduces legislation to expedite major projects, raising concerns over Indigenous rights.
In a significant legislative move, Canada's parliament has enacted the One Canadian Economy Act, enabling Prime Minister Mark Carney’s government to fast-track crucial national infrastructure projects. This pivotal bill passed through the Senate, allowing the cabinet to streamline approval processes, circumventing certain federal regulatory frameworks to potentially stimulate economic growth.
Supporters of the act argue that it is essential to strengthen Canada's economic independence from the United States, especially in light of ongoing trade disputes and tariffs imposed by U.S. President Donald Trump. The government hopes the expedited process can lead to the rapid development of energy corridors, pipelines, and mining operations that represent critical growth opportunities.
"This act will remove trade barriers, expedite nation-building projects, and unleash economic progress, with Indigenous partnerships at the forefront," Carney asserted recently. The legislation aims to enhance mobility for labor and internal trade, granting the government broad powers to authorize projects deemed "in the national interest."
Despite the promises of consultation with Indigenous communities, concerns have emerged regarding the law's potential marginalization of these groups. Critics, including Indigenous leaders, have expressed fears that the expedited process may bypass meaningful consultations, leading to decisions that could adversely affect their rights and territories.
Paul Prosper, a senator from Nova Scotia and member of the Mi'kmaq Indigenous community, highlighted the absence of a requirement for Indigenous consent in the bill. He emphasized the need for further discussions to ensure that development does not come at the expense of Indigenous rights. Prosper argued for a balanced approach to development, reiterating that no community should have to endure substandard living conditions for the sake of progress.
While advocates, like Senator Hassan Yussuff, deem the policy a necessary response to urgent economic realities, the passage of the act has left many questioning whether Canada will prioritize its Indigenous populations in the pursuit of economic expansion. As the government moves forward, the implications of this legislative change on both Indigenous rights and environmental safeguards remain to be seen.