In a court session at Guantanamo Bay, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed's planned guilty plea regarding his role in the 9/11 attacks has been postponed following US government objections, adding more uncertainty to a case plagued by delays and legal complexities over the last two decades.
Plea Deal for 9/11 Mastermind Delayed Amid Controversy

Plea Deal for 9/11 Mastermind Delayed Amid Controversy
Khalid Sheikh Mohammed's potential guilty plea remains on hold as legal disputes surface, complicating an already lengthy trial process at Guantanamo Bay.
Sitting in a military court at the US naval base in Guantanamo Bay, notorious defendant Khalid Sheikh Mohammed appeared attentive as the proceedings unfolded. "Can you confirm that Mr Mohammed is pleading guilty to all charges and specifications without exceptions or substitutions?" the judge inquired of his lawyer. "Yes, we can, Your Honour," the legal representative affirmed. At 59 years old, Mohammed, dressed in traditional garb and sporting an orange-dyed beard, bears little resemblance to the images circulated following his arrest in 2003.
The accused orchestrator of the 9/11 terror attacks had plans to formally express his guilt this week, nearly 23 years after the tragic event that claimed nearly 3,000 lives—deemed by the US government as "the most egregious criminal act on American soil in modern history." However, just as Mohammed was set to proceed with his plea, the judge adjourned the court due to a ruling from a federal appeals court. This unexpected development has intensified ongoing frustrations surrounding the case, which has faced a decade-long series of delays. One victim's relative succinctly described the situation as "the forever trial."
The pause is particularly significant given that Mohammed previously admitted to overseeing the 9/11 plot, from training pilots to carrying the plans to Osama bin Laden, the founder of al-Qaeda. He was supposed to plead guilty under a controversial arrangement that promised he would not face the death penalty. However, the US government has sought to rescind this agreement, claiming it would instigate irreparable harm to the public. Supporters of the plea deal argue it is the only reasonable path forward, especially considering the allegations of torture affecting the case's evidence.
As a result, a three-judge panel at the federal appeals court called for a delay to review the government's request. Families of 9/11 victims had traveled to Guantanamo for the scheduled plea and were left in disappointment after the proceedings were paused once again. Elizabeth Miller, whose father died during the attacks, expressed her frustration, recognizing her desire for closure yet acknowledging the mixed feelings among other victim families.
This latest setback stands as part of an extensive timeline of complications at Guantanamo, where the US military has held detainees since January 2002. Established under President George W. Bush, the military tribunal system permitted the detainment of non-US citizens without charge. Conditions have marginally improved since then, but the facility continues to face scrutiny from the UN and human rights advocates.
Current legal frameworks for the remaining detainees are starkly different from traditional US criminal justice protocols. While Mohammed's case has continued to dominate headlines, others held at Guantanamo have spent years without formal charges. The military continues to operate under rules that have drawn criticism worldwide, as more detainees are gradually repatriated—recently reducing the number of inmates at Guantanamo to the lowest in its history.
As the court session concluded, the judge indicated that Mohammed's plea, should it be permitted, would likely occur during a future US administration, further elongating the uncertainty surrounding this high-profile trial.