In a twist of events during Harvey Weinstein's sex crimes trial, a New York judge declared a mistrial on a pivotal rape charge after a juror opted out of continuing deliberations. The case revolved around a 2013 attack on actress Jessica Mann. The jury previously reached a verdict, finding Weinstein guilty of one count of sexual assault while acquitting him on another charge. The conflict within the twelve-member jury persisted for over six days, predominantly involving heated disagreements. The foreperson expressed fears of hostility from other jurors, which ultimately led to the judge's decision. This mistrial comes after Weinstein's previous conviction was overturned last year. The current trial featured testimonies from several women, each detailing Weinstein's alleged misuse of power within the entertainment industry. The ongoing legal battles continue to cast a shadow on Weinstein's lengthy sentence stemming from past convictions.
Mistrial Declared in Weinstein's Rape Charge After Juror Refusal
Mistrial Declared in Weinstein's Rape Charge After Juror Refusal
A New York judge has ruled a mistrial after jury turmoil disrupts decision-making on a rape allegation against Harvey Weinstein.
In a media briefing, Judge Curtis Farber acknowledged the intense deliberations, emphasizing that juror conflicts can spiral into heated confrontations, complicating the decision-making process. The overturned conviction from last April raises additional questions about the legal proceedings and their implications on the ongoing fight against sexual crimes in Hollywood. The current outcome leaves significant uncertainty about Weinstein's future in light of both the recent verdict and his prior convictions.
